Showing posts with label available. Show all posts
Showing posts with label available. Show all posts

Friday, March 9, 2012

MySQL function equivalent

Hi,
In MySQL, from_unixtime(lonvalue) returns the date format in 'YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS'. Is there any equivalent available in SQL Server, to view the date in man readable format, when the input is an long value in milliseconds.
Eg :
SELECT FROM_UNIXTIME(875996580);
Thanks,
Smitha
Take a look at the CONVERT function in Books Online. It has different styles that you can use. Optionally you can format the string using various datepart calls.

select CONVERT(varchar, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, 121) -- odbc canonical format|||select CONVERT(varchar, '875996580', 121);
Output : 875996580

As I had said earlier, the input is a long value (in milliseconds)|||There is no native function that will understand the Unix format directly. You have to write your own TSQL UDF to do the conversion based on the format.|||

isnt 'from_unixtime(longvalue)' return a date that is longvalue seconds from 1/1/1970 ? not milleseconds?

select dateadd(s, 875996580, '1/1/1970')
yields:
1997-10-04 20:23:00.000

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

My Whole installation is hosed

There is a new Management Studio Express CTP download available at http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=82AFBD59-57A4-455E-A2D6-1D4C98D40F6E&displaylang=en.

This update fixes the defect where installing the full Books Online documentation prevented Management Studio Express from starting. With the update, Management Studio Express and Books Online no longer interfere with each other.

To update Management Studio Express CTP:

1) Uninstall Management Studio Express CTP from your machine.
2) Clear your browser's download cache. If you are using Internet Explorer 6, you can do this by starting Internet Explorer, clicking the Tools | Options menu item, and then clicking the "Delete Files..." button in the "Temporary Internet Files" section.
3) Download and run SQLServer2005_SSMSEE.msi (or SQLServer2005_SSMSEE_x64.msi) from the URL listed above

Either the wrong version of the Management Studio Express CTP download is being used, or the bug hasn't been fixed - as I discovered this morning.

I installed the Management Studio Express and the SQL Books Online. Once the SQL Books Online was installed the Management Studio Express would not start. When I remove the SQL Books Online, the Management Studio Express works just fine.

Could you please check to ensure that the current build of both the Management Studio Express and the Books Online are both the latest builds and let us know when the correct version(s) is available?

Many thanks,

Flavelle|||

I've verified that after installing Management Studio Express CTP from the download site (dated November 11, 2005) and Books Online on a clean machine, Management Studio Express does start.

Only if some version of SQL Server 2005 Management Studio is installed will Management Studio Express not start, and in that event a message box explaining that Management Studio Express cannot run is displayed.

Make sure sqlwb.exe (the full Management Studio's executable) is not installed in your ...\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\binn\vsshell\common7\ide directory. This is what the side-by-side check is looking for.

It is also possible that your web browser has a cached copy of SQLServer2005_SSMSEE.msi from a previous download which it was using. Clearing the browser's download cache might help. If you are using Internet Explorer 6, you can do this by opening IE, clicking on Tools | Options in the menu bar, then clicking the "Delete Files..." button in the "Temporary Internet Files" section. Please let us know if this fixes (or doesn't fix) the problem.

|||HI,

My installation went like this
1) My machine was not a clean install. I have June CTP on it initially. *However*, I used the clean up tool that was provided in the download area to remove any versions of the betas that already existed.
2) installed the sql server express
3) installed the above link for the Management studio

Then I tried a some old sql server script in the management studio to see compatability.

Then I woke up today and said well lets loads books and samples.

Now my Management studio will not load.

What I have done:
1) uninstalled Management Studio
2) installed Management Studio

Did not work

3) did as steven suggested
a)delete files
b)checked the ide directory - NO FILE WAS FOUND

Still did not work

4) Did what the above user stated.
*removed online books

Worked

Any other suggestions? be nice to have books online.

many thanks,

Angela|||Steven:

I verified that sqlwb.exe is not installed - not only in the directory that you suggested, but also anywhere on my machine.

Cleared all temporary files and redownloaded both the Management Studio Express CTP and the SQL Books Online and re-installed both from the new downloads.

With SQL Books Online installed, the Management Studio Express does not work at all. I am not sure what message box you are referring to - I get nothing. Checking Task Manager shows no change in the number of open processes.

The only thing that I can think of is that I did have Visual Studio 2005 Beta 2 installed on my machine, but that was removed long before I started this exercise.

Uninstalled SQL Books online and the Management Studio Express works fine. If I reinstall SQL Books Online, then Management Studio Express does not start - and I do not get any message.

Like Angela said, it would be very nice to be able to run both. Even better would be to have Help integrated with Management Studio Express from SQL Books Online, but at this point, I would happily settle for being able to run both at the same time.

Problem still exists - any more thoughts would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Flavelle|||I installed
1. Win XP Profi
2. Net Framework 2
3. Net Framework SDK
4. Management Express CTP
(Management Studio Express CTP works ok.)
5. SQL Books Online
(Management Studio Express does not start. No error, no messagebox, no any window.)

I uninstalled SQL Books Online and it works

I have version 2005.90.1399.0 .

Jirka
|||
I uninstalled SQL Books Online and it works too

ssmsee.exe version 9.00.1399.06|||
This is the information from About that is on the SSME that I installed from the link:
Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express 9.00.1399.00
Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) 2000.085.1117.00 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158)
Microsoft MSXML 2.6 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0.2900.2180
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0.50727.42
Operating System 5.1.2600

The SQL Books online is version 9.00.1399.06

Hope this helps somebody, because this is becoming a Royal Pain. I am coming from an MS Access world and things are sure different in SQL Server.

Regards,

Flavelle|||Well,

I miss spoke. UNinstalling the books did get the Management Studio to come back and run.

*HOwever*, I cna no longer program in the management studio with the query analyzer portion of it. Things that were working before are no longer working...

I ma in the process of using that exe that removes betas to remove the current version of express from my computer.

I will install it yet again *just* the sqlExpress and the management studio. ANd see if that works again. Hopefully, it will..

Is there somewhere online that I can access the books lonline until this problem gets fixed?

I let you know what happened.

Many thanks!

Angela|||Well,

My whole installation is hosed unfortuantely, I am now going to try and REstore to a particular point to get my system back to the way it was.

Otherwise, I will have to spend an entire day rebuilding my system.

Just not good.

The SMSE does not work at all with the query analyzer portion. I can't even create a stored procedure or insert a row into the table.

Hopefully restoring before I put the books on will do the trick.

Let you know :(

Angela|||

When you downloaded the updated Management Studio Express, did you see it take some time to download it again, or did it start immediately? (If it starts immediately, you're running a cached copy of the Windows installer package for SSMSE.)

If you rename the "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\Shell" registry key to "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\ShellX" using regedit, SSMSE should start. This should not affect the stand-alone Books Online at all.

After you rename the registry key and then start Management Studio Express, does the splash Screen say "SQL Server Management Studio Express Edition" or just "Management Studio Express"? The November 11 download says "Management Studio Express."

|||Flavelle, thanks for the version information. That will help investigate this further.

Keep in mind that the Management Studio Express Community Technology Preview is a pre-release product and it isn't "fully baked" - basically it's a daily build from early November. It hasn't had the full stabilization and defect fixing treatment that the full version of SQL Server has gone through. It will be fully stabilized and defects will be fixed before it is released in the first half of 2006.

We made MSE available early to gather feedback from our Express users. Aside from just helping us find defects, we're hoping to gather feedback on how people feel about our MSE design decisions. I'm particularly interested to know how much our decision not to allow MSE to run on the same machine on which people have installed the full Management Studio impacts Express users and whether our decision not to have integrated help in MSE is a big deal to people. (We have user feedback that seems to say people who would use Express tools won't have the full tools on the same machine and that keeping the download size under 30 MB is was really important and people would be willing to give up integrated help if it reduced the download size from 120 MB to 30, which it does.)

I realize this has been pretty frustrating for early adopters, and I apologize for that. I hope there is some consolation in knowing that your feedback now is helping to improve the product when it finally ships in 2006.|||Steven:

Thanks for the information. I would like to remind you of something you said when the thread started:

This update fixes the defect where installing the full Books Online documentation prevented Management Studio Express from starting. With the update, Management Studio Express and Books Online no longer interfere with each other.

On the basis of what is in this thread, I would suggest that might not be the case. Mine is a relatively clean installation - I don't have Visual Studio installed yet, although it is ordered - just waiting for delivery:-)

When I receive Visual Studio, I do plan on installing it. In my case, I do not have a full SQL Server (haven't figured out how to set it up yet - that's a different story). I am a small developer, working on an application. My paying job is a Requirements Engineer and I have been working in development, requirements, and business analysis for more than 20 years. Since I have a little down time, I am going to learn SQL Server. It may kill me, but I will learn it! The SQL Express product is exactly what I need for my application. There are not a lot of managment tools for SQL Express, but the SSME seems to be good enough for my purposes.

It would be nice if it had integrated help, or if it could be hooked into SQL Books Online, and I would be quite happy to have a 120 MB file size. I also have a high-speed internet connection, so the large download is less of an issue for me than it might be for some of your other target users, so I can live without the integrated help.

What is proving very frustrating is that I cannot run both SSME and SQL Books Online. I would be perfectly happy if I could, but I cannot - and that is something that probably shouldn't wait until 2006 to fix, particularly given your statement at the start of the thread.

I am not ranting, just providing what I hope is useful feedback. If there is any more information that I can provide you, please feel free to ask - this is important to me, and I do appreciate your time and support in resolving this issue. In the meantime, please fix the problem as soon as you possibly can, because I am already going through a painful learning curve. I made the interesting discovery about how to replace the MS Access IIF() function, and I am still hoping that someone can tell me how to implement a unique constraint on a field that conforms to ANSI (allows many Null values, but only one instance of each non-Null value).

thanks,

Flavelle|||Steven:

In answer to your specific questions:

1. I downloaded from the site and saved to my local hard drive - if you would like, I will be happy to send the specific files for both SSME and BOL that I received so that you can verify that I am working with the right ones. My e-mail address is fballem@.ballemco.com. If you send me an e-mail, then I will zip and send one or both files to you, whichever would be most helpful to you.

2. I tried renaming the registry entry after installing BOL. When I started BOL, I got an error - sent the report to Microsoft using the standard method. If there is any information that I can provide you that will allow you to find this error, then please let me know. The error occurred at about 5:00 p.m. EST. I renamed the registry entry back to Shell and then uninstalled BOL. SSME works fine.

3. The splash screen is very fast, so I can't read it.

Are you having fun yet?

Regards,

Flavelle|||

Flavelle,

No problem - I appreciate your feedback.

I suspect that your web browser cache or a web proxy cache is interfering with you downloading the November 11 update and you are reinstalling the November 7 release again. You can tell which version you have by checking the creation date of the ssmsee.exe file in ...\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\Binn\VSShell\Common7\IDE. If the creation date is November 10, 2005, then you have the update. If the creation date is November 3, then you have the first release.

If you have the first release, you can use regedit to rename the "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\Shell" key to "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\ShellX". This will let the November 7 version of MSE run with Books Online. If MSE still can't start, then we have an unrelated problem I need to investigate further.

The only differences between the November 11 update and the November 7 release are that the November 11 release is supposed to fix the problem with starting MSE when Books Online is installed (without renaming or removing the registry key), the problem of the error message explaining why it isn't starting not appearing, and that the splash screen says "Management Studio Express" rather than "SQL Server Management Studio Express Edition" for the product name.

My Transaction Log size very strange

Hi
I use SQL Server 2000
I use Full recuperation mode.
My DB size is 458 MB (344 in use, 114 available)
My log size is 18 MB
I do Full backup every hour starting at 8:00 am until 21:00
I do transaction backup every 10 minutes.
The problem is that the size of the transaction log backup is strange, as
follows:
Time Size(KB) filename
...
05:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140552.TRN
06:02 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140602.TRN
06:12 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140612.TRN
06:22 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140622.TRN
06:32 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140632.TRN
06:42 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140642.TRN
06:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140652.TRN
07:03 359.117.312 myDB_tlog_200507140703.TRN Note
07:12 133.072.384 myDB_tlog_200507140712.TRN Note
07:22 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140722.TRN
07:32 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140732.TRN
07:42 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140742.TRN
07:52 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140752.TRN
08:02 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140802.TRN
08:12 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140812.TRN
08:22 357.888 myDB_tlog_200507140822.TRN
08:32 422.400 myDB_tlog_200507140832.TRN
08:42 10.663.424 myDB_tlog_200507140842.TRN Note
08:52 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140852.TRN
09:02 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140902.TRN
09:12 699.904 myDB_tlog_200507140912.TRN
09:22 503.296 myDB_tlog_200507140922.TRN
09:32 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140932.TRN
09:42 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140942.TRN
09:52 569.856 myDB_tlog_200507140952.TRN
10:02 372.224 myDB_tlog_200507141002.TRN
10:12 10.442.240 myDB_tlog_200507141012.TRN Note
10:22 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141022.TRN
10:32 545.280 myDB_tlog_200507141032.TRN
10:42 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141042.TRN
10:52 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141052.TRN
11:02 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141102.TRN
11:12 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141112.TRN
11:22 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141122.TRN
11:32 546.304 myDB_tlog_200507141132.TRN
11:42 1.093.120 myDB_tlog_200507141142.TRN
11:52 303.616 myDB_tlog_200507141152.TRN
12:02 436.736 myDB_tlog_200507141202.TRN
12:12 369.152 myDB_tlog_200507141212.TRN
12:22 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141222.TRN
12:32 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141232.TRN
12:42 107.008 myDB_tlog_200507141242.TRN
12:52 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141252.TRN
13:02 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141302.TRN
13:12 9.269.760 myDB_tlog_200507141312.TRN Note
13:22 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141322.TRN
13:32 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141332.TRN
13:42 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141342.TRN
13:52 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141352.TRN
14:02 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141402.TRN
14:12 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141412.TRN
14:22 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141422.TRN
14:32 289.280 myDB_tlog_200507141432.TRN
14:42 16.926.208 myDB_tlog_200507141442.TRN Note
14:52 280.064 myDB_tlog_200507141452.TRN
15:02 411.136 myDB_tlog_200507141502.TRN
Any ideas?
I want to know what is happening, and how to fix it.
Thanks in advance.Hi,
The Size of the transaction log backup will be bigger if you have Bulk
transaction or if you are doing a maintanence operation such
as UPDATE STATISTICS, DBCC INDEXDEFREAG or DBCC DBREINDEX.
Looking in to the current size the transaction log (LDF) I feel that you are
in safe side.
Thanks
Hari
SQL Server MVP
"Juan Carlos" <jcgalarzar@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eP2z25KiFHA.320@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> I use SQL Server 2000
> I use Full recuperation mode.
> My DB size is 458 MB (344 in use, 114 available)
> My log size is 18 MB
> I do Full backup every hour starting at 8:00 am until 21:00
> I do transaction backup every 10 minutes.
> The problem is that the size of the transaction log backup is strange, as
> follows:
> Time Size(KB) filename
> ...
> 05:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140552.TRN
> 06:02 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140602.TRN
> 06:12 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140612.TRN
> 06:22 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140622.TRN
> 06:32 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140632.TRN
> 06:42 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140642.TRN
> 06:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140652.TRN
> 07:03 359.117.312 myDB_tlog_200507140703.TRN Note
> 07:12 133.072.384 myDB_tlog_200507140712.TRN Note
> 07:22 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140722.TRN
> 07:32 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140732.TRN
> 07:42 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140742.TRN
> 07:52 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140752.TRN
> 08:02 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140802.TRN
> 08:12 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140812.TRN
> 08:22 357.888 myDB_tlog_200507140822.TRN
> 08:32 422.400 myDB_tlog_200507140832.TRN
> 08:42 10.663.424 myDB_tlog_200507140842.TRN Note
> 08:52 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140852.TRN
> 09:02 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140902.TRN
> 09:12 699.904 myDB_tlog_200507140912.TRN
> 09:22 503.296 myDB_tlog_200507140922.TRN
> 09:32 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140932.TRN
> 09:42 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140942.TRN
> 09:52 569.856 myDB_tlog_200507140952.TRN
> 10:02 372.224 myDB_tlog_200507141002.TRN
> 10:12 10.442.240 myDB_tlog_200507141012.TRN Note
> 10:22 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141022.TRN
> 10:32 545.280 myDB_tlog_200507141032.TRN
> 10:42 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141042.TRN
> 10:52 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141052.TRN
> 11:02 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141102.TRN
> 11:12 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141112.TRN
> 11:22 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141122.TRN
> 11:32 546.304 myDB_tlog_200507141132.TRN
> 11:42 1.093.120 myDB_tlog_200507141142.TRN
> 11:52 303.616 myDB_tlog_200507141152.TRN
> 12:02 436.736 myDB_tlog_200507141202.TRN
> 12:12 369.152 myDB_tlog_200507141212.TRN
> 12:22 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141222.TRN
> 12:32 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141232.TRN
> 12:42 107.008 myDB_tlog_200507141242.TRN
> 12:52 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141252.TRN
> 13:02 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141302.TRN
> 13:12 9.269.760 myDB_tlog_200507141312.TRN Note
> 13:22 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141322.TRN
> 13:32 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141332.TRN
> 13:42 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141342.TRN
> 13:52 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141352.TRN
> 14:02 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141402.TRN
> 14:12 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141412.TRN
> 14:22 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141422.TRN
> 14:32 289.280 myDB_tlog_200507141432.TRN
> 14:42 16.926.208 myDB_tlog_200507141442.TRN Note
> 14:52 280.064 myDB_tlog_200507141452.TRN
> 15:02 411.136 myDB_tlog_200507141502.TRN
> Any ideas?
> I want to know what is happening, and how to fix it.
> Thanks in advance.
>
>|||Thanks Hari.
But I'm still confused about then changing size!!!
From 300 KB to 16 MB.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
"Hari Prasad" <hari_prasad_k@.hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:uLHvBRLiFHA.2852@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> The Size of the transaction log backup will be bigger if you have Bulk
> transaction or if you are doing a maintanence operation such
> as UPDATE STATISTICS, DBCC INDEXDEFREAG or DBCC DBREINDEX.
> Looking in to the current size the transaction log (LDF) I feel that you
are
> in safe side.
> Thanks
> Hari
> SQL Server MVP
>
>
> "Juan Carlos" <jcgalarzar@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eP2z25KiFHA.320@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > Hi
> > I use SQL Server 2000
> > I use Full recuperation mode.
> > My DB size is 458 MB (344 in use, 114 available)
> > My log size is 18 MB
> > I do Full backup every hour starting at 8:00 am until 21:00
> > I do transaction backup every 10 minutes.
> >
> > The problem is that the size of the transaction log backup is strange,
as
> > follows:
> >
> > Time Size(KB) filename
> > ...
> > 05:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140552.TRN
> > 06:02 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140602.TRN
> > 06:12 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140612.TRN
> > 06:22 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140622.TRN
> > 06:32 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140632.TRN
> > 06:42 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140642.TRN
> > 06:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140652.TRN
> > 07:03 359.117.312 myDB_tlog_200507140703.TRN Note
> > 07:12 133.072.384 myDB_tlog_200507140712.TRN Note
> > 07:22 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140722.TRN
> > 07:32 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140732.TRN
> > 07:42 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140742.TRN
> > 07:52 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140752.TRN
> > 08:02 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140802.TRN
> > 08:12 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140812.TRN
> > 08:22 357.888 myDB_tlog_200507140822.TRN
> > 08:32 422.400 myDB_tlog_200507140832.TRN
> > 08:42 10.663.424 myDB_tlog_200507140842.TRN Note
> > 08:52 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140852.TRN
> > 09:02 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140902.TRN
> > 09:12 699.904 myDB_tlog_200507140912.TRN
> > 09:22 503.296 myDB_tlog_200507140922.TRN
> > 09:32 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140932.TRN
> > 09:42 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140942.TRN
> > 09:52 569.856 myDB_tlog_200507140952.TRN
> > 10:02 372.224 myDB_tlog_200507141002.TRN
> > 10:12 10.442.240 myDB_tlog_200507141012.TRN Note
> > 10:22 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141022.TRN
> > 10:32 545.280 myDB_tlog_200507141032.TRN
> > 10:42 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141042.TRN
> > 10:52 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141052.TRN
> > 11:02 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141102.TRN
> > 11:12 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141112.TRN
> > 11:22 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141122.TRN
> > 11:32 546.304 myDB_tlog_200507141132.TRN
> > 11:42 1.093.120 myDB_tlog_200507141142.TRN
> > 11:52 303.616 myDB_tlog_200507141152.TRN
> > 12:02 436.736 myDB_tlog_200507141202.TRN
> > 12:12 369.152 myDB_tlog_200507141212.TRN
> > 12:22 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141222.TRN
> > 12:32 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141232.TRN
> > 12:42 107.008 myDB_tlog_200507141242.TRN
> > 12:52 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141252.TRN
> > 13:02 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141302.TRN
> > 13:12 9.269.760 myDB_tlog_200507141312.TRN Note
> > 13:22 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141322.TRN
> > 13:32 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141332.TRN
> > 13:42 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141342.TRN
> > 13:52 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141352.TRN
> > 14:02 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141402.TRN
> > 14:12 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141412.TRN
> > 14:22 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141422.TRN
> > 14:32 289.280 myDB_tlog_200507141432.TRN
> > 14:42 16.926.208 myDB_tlog_200507141442.TRN Note
> > 14:52 280.064 myDB_tlog_200507141452.TRN
> > 15:02 411.136 myDB_tlog_200507141502.TRN
> >
> > Any ideas?
> > I want to know what is happening, and how to fix it.
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> >
>|||The amount of data in the log is totally dependant on what you are doing
since the last log backup. Use profiler to see what is happening during the
time when the log backups are large and you will see what i causing the
difference.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Juan Carlos" <jcgalarzar@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23pEhNpLiFHA.1372@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Hari.
> But I'm still confused about then changing size!!!
> From 300 KB to 16 MB.
> Any ideas?
> Thanks in advance.
> "Hari Prasad" <hari_prasad_k@.hotmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:uLHvBRLiFHA.2852@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>> The Size of the transaction log backup will be bigger if you have Bulk
>> transaction or if you are doing a maintanence operation such
>> as UPDATE STATISTICS, DBCC INDEXDEFREAG or DBCC DBREINDEX.
>> Looking in to the current size the transaction log (LDF) I feel that you
> are
>> in safe side.
>> Thanks
>> Hari
>> SQL Server MVP
>>
>>
>> "Juan Carlos" <jcgalarzar@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:eP2z25KiFHA.320@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> > Hi
>> > I use SQL Server 2000
>> > I use Full recuperation mode.
>> > My DB size is 458 MB (344 in use, 114 available)
>> > My log size is 18 MB
>> > I do Full backup every hour starting at 8:00 am until 21:00
>> > I do transaction backup every 10 minutes.
>> >
>> > The problem is that the size of the transaction log backup is strange,
> as
>> > follows:
>> >
>> > Time Size(KB) filename
>> > ...
>> > 05:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140552.TRN
>> > 06:02 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140602.TRN
>> > 06:12 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140612.TRN
>> > 06:22 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140622.TRN
>> > 06:32 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140632.TRN
>> > 06:42 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140642.TRN
>> > 06:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140652.TRN
>> > 07:03 359.117.312 myDB_tlog_200507140703.TRN Note
>> > 07:12 133.072.384 myDB_tlog_200507140712.TRN Note
>> > 07:22 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140722.TRN
>> > 07:32 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140732.TRN
>> > 07:42 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140742.TRN
>> > 07:52 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140752.TRN
>> > 08:02 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140802.TRN
>> > 08:12 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140812.TRN
>> > 08:22 357.888 myDB_tlog_200507140822.TRN
>> > 08:32 422.400 myDB_tlog_200507140832.TRN
>> > 08:42 10.663.424 myDB_tlog_200507140842.TRN Note
>> > 08:52 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140852.TRN
>> > 09:02 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140902.TRN
>> > 09:12 699.904 myDB_tlog_200507140912.TRN
>> > 09:22 503.296 myDB_tlog_200507140922.TRN
>> > 09:32 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140932.TRN
>> > 09:42 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140942.TRN
>> > 09:52 569.856 myDB_tlog_200507140952.TRN
>> > 10:02 372.224 myDB_tlog_200507141002.TRN
>> > 10:12 10.442.240 myDB_tlog_200507141012.TRN Note
>> > 10:22 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141022.TRN
>> > 10:32 545.280 myDB_tlog_200507141032.TRN
>> > 10:42 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141042.TRN
>> > 10:52 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141052.TRN
>> > 11:02 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141102.TRN
>> > 11:12 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141112.TRN
>> > 11:22 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141122.TRN
>> > 11:32 546.304 myDB_tlog_200507141132.TRN
>> > 11:42 1.093.120 myDB_tlog_200507141142.TRN
>> > 11:52 303.616 myDB_tlog_200507141152.TRN
>> > 12:02 436.736 myDB_tlog_200507141202.TRN
>> > 12:12 369.152 myDB_tlog_200507141212.TRN
>> > 12:22 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141222.TRN
>> > 12:32 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141232.TRN
>> > 12:42 107.008 myDB_tlog_200507141242.TRN
>> > 12:52 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141252.TRN
>> > 13:02 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141302.TRN
>> > 13:12 9.269.760 myDB_tlog_200507141312.TRN Note
>> > 13:22 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141322.TRN
>> > 13:32 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141332.TRN
>> > 13:42 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141342.TRN
>> > 13:52 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141352.TRN
>> > 14:02 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141402.TRN
>> > 14:12 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141412.TRN
>> > 14:22 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141422.TRN
>> > 14:32 289.280 myDB_tlog_200507141432.TRN
>> > 14:42 16.926.208 myDB_tlog_200507141442.TRN Note
>> > 14:52 280.064 myDB_tlog_200507141452.TRN
>> > 15:02 411.136 myDB_tlog_200507141502.TRN
>> >
>> > Any ideas?
>> > I want to know what is happening, and how to fix it.
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>

My Transaction Log size very strange

Hi
I use SQL Server 2000
I use Full recuperation mode.
My DB size is 458 MB (344 in use, 114 available)
My log size is 18 MB
I do Full backup every hour starting at 8:00 am until 21:00
I do transaction backup every 10 minutes.
The problem is that the size of the transaction log backup is strange, as
follows:
Time Size(KB) filename
....
05:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140552.TRN
06:02 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140602.TRN
06:12 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140612.TRN
06:22 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140622.TRN
06:32 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140632.TRN
06:42 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140642.TRN
06:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140652.TRN
07:03 359.117.312 myDB_tlog_200507140703.TRN Note
07:12 133.072.384 myDB_tlog_200507140712.TRN Note
07:22 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140722.TRN
07:32 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140732.TRN
07:42 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140742.TRN
07:52 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140752.TRN
08:02 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140802.TRN
08:12 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140812.TRN
08:22 357.888 myDB_tlog_200507140822.TRN
08:32 422.400 myDB_tlog_200507140832.TRN
08:42 10.663.424 myDB_tlog_200507140842.TRN Note
08:52 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140852.TRN
09:02 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140902.TRN
09:12 699.904 myDB_tlog_200507140912.TRN
09:22 503.296 myDB_tlog_200507140922.TRN
09:32 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140932.TRN
09:42 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140942.TRN
09:52 569.856 myDB_tlog_200507140952.TRN
10:02 372.224 myDB_tlog_200507141002.TRN
10:12 10.442.240 myDB_tlog_200507141012.TRN Note
10:22 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141022.TRN
10:32 545.280 myDB_tlog_200507141032.TRN
10:42 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141042.TRN
10:52 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141052.TRN
11:02 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141102.TRN
11:12 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141112.TRN
11:22 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141122.TRN
11:32 546.304 myDB_tlog_200507141132.TRN
11:42 1.093.120 myDB_tlog_200507141142.TRN
11:52 303.616 myDB_tlog_200507141152.TRN
12:02 436.736 myDB_tlog_200507141202.TRN
12:12 369.152 myDB_tlog_200507141212.TRN
12:22 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141222.TRN
12:32 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141232.TRN
12:42 107.008 myDB_tlog_200507141242.TRN
12:52 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141252.TRN
13:02 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141302.TRN
13:12 9.269.760 myDB_tlog_200507141312.TRN Note
13:22 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141322.TRN
13:32 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141332.TRN
13:42 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141342.TRN
13:52 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141352.TRN
14:02 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141402.TRN
14:12 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141412.TRN
14:22 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141422.TRN
14:32 289.280 myDB_tlog_200507141432.TRN
14:42 16.926.208 myDB_tlog_200507141442.TRN Note
14:52 280.064 myDB_tlog_200507141452.TRN
15:02 411.136 myDB_tlog_200507141502.TRN
Any ideas?
I want to know what is happening, and how to fix it.
Thanks in advance.
Hi,
The Size of the transaction log backup will be bigger if you have Bulk
transaction or if you are doing a maintanence operation such
as UPDATE STATISTICS, DBCC INDEXDEFREAG or DBCC DBREINDEX.
Looking in to the current size the transaction log (LDF) I feel that you are
in safe side.
Thanks
Hari
SQL Server MVP
"Juan Carlos" <jcgalarzar@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eP2z25KiFHA.320@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> I use SQL Server 2000
> I use Full recuperation mode.
> My DB size is 458 MB (344 in use, 114 available)
> My log size is 18 MB
> I do Full backup every hour starting at 8:00 am until 21:00
> I do transaction backup every 10 minutes.
> The problem is that the size of the transaction log backup is strange, as
> follows:
> Time Size(KB) filename
> ...
> 05:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140552.TRN
> 06:02 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140602.TRN
> 06:12 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140612.TRN
> 06:22 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140622.TRN
> 06:32 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140632.TRN
> 06:42 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140642.TRN
> 06:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140652.TRN
> 07:03 359.117.312 myDB_tlog_200507140703.TRN Note
> 07:12 133.072.384 myDB_tlog_200507140712.TRN Note
> 07:22 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140722.TRN
> 07:32 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140732.TRN
> 07:42 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140742.TRN
> 07:52 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140752.TRN
> 08:02 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140802.TRN
> 08:12 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140812.TRN
> 08:22 357.888 myDB_tlog_200507140822.TRN
> 08:32 422.400 myDB_tlog_200507140832.TRN
> 08:42 10.663.424 myDB_tlog_200507140842.TRN Note
> 08:52 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140852.TRN
> 09:02 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140902.TRN
> 09:12 699.904 myDB_tlog_200507140912.TRN
> 09:22 503.296 myDB_tlog_200507140922.TRN
> 09:32 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140932.TRN
> 09:42 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140942.TRN
> 09:52 569.856 myDB_tlog_200507140952.TRN
> 10:02 372.224 myDB_tlog_200507141002.TRN
> 10:12 10.442.240 myDB_tlog_200507141012.TRN Note
> 10:22 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141022.TRN
> 10:32 545.280 myDB_tlog_200507141032.TRN
> 10:42 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141042.TRN
> 10:52 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141052.TRN
> 11:02 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141102.TRN
> 11:12 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141112.TRN
> 11:22 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141122.TRN
> 11:32 546.304 myDB_tlog_200507141132.TRN
> 11:42 1.093.120 myDB_tlog_200507141142.TRN
> 11:52 303.616 myDB_tlog_200507141152.TRN
> 12:02 436.736 myDB_tlog_200507141202.TRN
> 12:12 369.152 myDB_tlog_200507141212.TRN
> 12:22 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141222.TRN
> 12:32 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141232.TRN
> 12:42 107.008 myDB_tlog_200507141242.TRN
> 12:52 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141252.TRN
> 13:02 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141302.TRN
> 13:12 9.269.760 myDB_tlog_200507141312.TRN Note
> 13:22 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141322.TRN
> 13:32 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141332.TRN
> 13:42 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141342.TRN
> 13:52 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141352.TRN
> 14:02 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141402.TRN
> 14:12 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141412.TRN
> 14:22 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141422.TRN
> 14:32 289.280 myDB_tlog_200507141432.TRN
> 14:42 16.926.208 myDB_tlog_200507141442.TRN Note
> 14:52 280.064 myDB_tlog_200507141452.TRN
> 15:02 411.136 myDB_tlog_200507141502.TRN
> Any ideas?
> I want to know what is happening, and how to fix it.
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
|||Thanks Hari.
But I'm still confused about then changing size!!!
From 300 KB to 16 MB.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
"Hari Prasad" <hari_prasad_k@.hotmail.com> escribi en el mensaje
news:uLHvBRLiFHA.2852@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> The Size of the transaction log backup will be bigger if you have Bulk
> transaction or if you are doing a maintanence operation such
> as UPDATE STATISTICS, DBCC INDEXDEFREAG or DBCC DBREINDEX.
> Looking in to the current size the transaction log (LDF) I feel that you
are[vbcol=seagreen]
> in safe side.
> Thanks
> Hari
> SQL Server MVP
>
>
> "Juan Carlos" <jcgalarzar@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eP2z25KiFHA.320@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
as
>
|||The amount of data in the log is totally dependant on what you are doing
since the last log backup. Use profiler to see what is happening during the
time when the log backups are large and you will see what i causing the
difference.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Juan Carlos" <jcgalarzar@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23pEhNpLiFHA.1372@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Hari.
> But I'm still confused about then changing size!!!
> From 300 KB to 16 MB.
> Any ideas?
> Thanks in advance.
> "Hari Prasad" <hari_prasad_k@.hotmail.com> escribi en el mensaje
> news:uLHvBRLiFHA.2852@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> are
> as
>

My Transaction Log size very strange

Hi
I use SQL Server 2000
I use Full recuperation mode.
My DB size is 458 MB (344 in use, 114 available)
My log size is 18 MB
I do Full backup every hour starting at 8:00 am until 21:00
I do transaction backup every 10 minutes.
The problem is that the size of the transaction log backup is strange, as
follows:
Time Size(KB) filename
...
05:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140552.TRN
06:02 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140602.TRN
06:12 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140612.TRN
06:22 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140622.TRN
06:32 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140632.TRN
06:42 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140642.TRN
06:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140652.TRN
07:03 359.117.312 myDB_tlog_200507140703.TRN Note
07:12 133.072.384 myDB_tlog_200507140712.TRN Note
07:22 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140722.TRN
07:32 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140732.TRN
07:42 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140742.TRN
07:52 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140752.TRN
08:02 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140802.TRN
08:12 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140812.TRN
08:22 357.888 myDB_tlog_200507140822.TRN
08:32 422.400 myDB_tlog_200507140832.TRN
08:42 10.663.424 myDB_tlog_200507140842.TRN Note
08:52 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140852.TRN
09:02 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140902.TRN
09:12 699.904 myDB_tlog_200507140912.TRN
09:22 503.296 myDB_tlog_200507140922.TRN
09:32 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140932.TRN
09:42 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140942.TRN
09:52 569.856 myDB_tlog_200507140952.TRN
10:02 372.224 myDB_tlog_200507141002.TRN
10:12 10.442.240 myDB_tlog_200507141012.TRN Note
10:22 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141022.TRN
10:32 545.280 myDB_tlog_200507141032.TRN
10:42 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141042.TRN
10:52 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141052.TRN
11:02 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141102.TRN
11:12 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141112.TRN
11:22 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141122.TRN
11:32 546.304 myDB_tlog_200507141132.TRN
11:42 1.093.120 myDB_tlog_200507141142.TRN
11:52 303.616 myDB_tlog_200507141152.TRN
12:02 436.736 myDB_tlog_200507141202.TRN
12:12 369.152 myDB_tlog_200507141212.TRN
12:22 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141222.TRN
12:32 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141232.TRN
12:42 107.008 myDB_tlog_200507141242.TRN
12:52 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141252.TRN
13:02 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141302.TRN
13:12 9.269.760 myDB_tlog_200507141312.TRN Note
13:22 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141322.TRN
13:32 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141332.TRN
13:42 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141342.TRN
13:52 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141352.TRN
14:02 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141402.TRN
14:12 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141412.TRN
14:22 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141422.TRN
14:32 289.280 myDB_tlog_200507141432.TRN
14:42 16.926.208 myDB_tlog_200507141442.TRN Note
14:52 280.064 myDB_tlog_200507141452.TRN
15:02 411.136 myDB_tlog_200507141502.TRN
Any ideas?
I want to know what is happening, and how to fix it.
Thanks in advance.Hi,
The Size of the transaction log backup will be bigger if you have Bulk
transaction or if you are doing a maintanence operation such
as UPDATE STATISTICS, DBCC INDEXDEFREAG or DBCC DBREINDEX.
Looking in to the current size the transaction log (LDF) I feel that you are
in safe side.
Thanks
Hari
SQL Server MVP
"Juan Carlos" <jcgalarzar@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eP2z25KiFHA.320@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> I use SQL Server 2000
> I use Full recuperation mode.
> My DB size is 458 MB (344 in use, 114 available)
> My log size is 18 MB
> I do Full backup every hour starting at 8:00 am until 21:00
> I do transaction backup every 10 minutes.
> The problem is that the size of the transaction log backup is strange, as
> follows:
> Time Size(KB) filename
> ...
> 05:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140552.TRN
> 06:02 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140602.TRN
> 06:12 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140612.TRN
> 06:22 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140622.TRN
> 06:32 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140632.TRN
> 06:42 11.776 myDB_tlog_200507140642.TRN
> 06:52 78.336 myDB_tlog_200507140652.TRN
> 07:03 359.117.312 myDB_tlog_200507140703.TRN Note
> 07:12 133.072.384 myDB_tlog_200507140712.TRN Note
> 07:22 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140722.TRN
> 07:32 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140732.TRN
> 07:42 291.328 myDB_tlog_200507140742.TRN
> 07:52 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140752.TRN
> 08:02 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140802.TRN
> 08:12 356.864 myDB_tlog_200507140812.TRN
> 08:22 357.888 myDB_tlog_200507140822.TRN
> 08:32 422.400 myDB_tlog_200507140832.TRN
> 08:42 10.663.424 myDB_tlog_200507140842.TRN Note
> 08:52 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140852.TRN
> 09:02 437.760 myDB_tlog_200507140902.TRN
> 09:12 699.904 myDB_tlog_200507140912.TRN
> 09:22 503.296 myDB_tlog_200507140922.TRN
> 09:32 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140932.TRN
> 09:42 568.832 myDB_tlog_200507140942.TRN
> 09:52 569.856 myDB_tlog_200507140952.TRN
> 10:02 372.224 myDB_tlog_200507141002.TRN
> 10:12 10.442.240 myDB_tlog_200507141012.TRN Note
> 10:22 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141022.TRN
> 10:32 545.280 myDB_tlog_200507141032.TRN
> 10:42 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141042.TRN
> 10:52 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141052.TRN
> 11:02 479.744 myDB_tlog_200507141102.TRN
> 11:12 413.184 myDB_tlog_200507141112.TRN
> 11:22 414.208 myDB_tlog_200507141122.TRN
> 11:32 546.304 myDB_tlog_200507141132.TRN
> 11:42 1.093.120 myDB_tlog_200507141142.TRN
> 11:52 303.616 myDB_tlog_200507141152.TRN
> 12:02 436.736 myDB_tlog_200507141202.TRN
> 12:12 369.152 myDB_tlog_200507141212.TRN
> 12:22 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141222.TRN
> 12:32 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141232.TRN
> 12:42 107.008 myDB_tlog_200507141242.TRN
> 12:52 172.544 myDB_tlog_200507141252.TRN
> 13:02 239.104 myDB_tlog_200507141302.TRN
> 13:12 9.269.760 myDB_tlog_200507141312.TRN Note
> 13:22 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141322.TRN
> 13:32 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141332.TRN
> 13:42 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141342.TRN
> 13:52 158.208 myDB_tlog_200507141352.TRN
> 14:02 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141402.TRN
> 14:12 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141412.TRN
> 14:22 92.672 myDB_tlog_200507141422.TRN
> 14:32 289.280 myDB_tlog_200507141432.TRN
> 14:42 16.926.208 myDB_tlog_200507141442.TRN Note
> 14:52 280.064 myDB_tlog_200507141452.TRN
> 15:02 411.136 myDB_tlog_200507141502.TRN
> Any ideas?
> I want to know what is happening, and how to fix it.
> Thanks in advance.
>
>|||Thanks Hari.
But I'm still confused about then changing size!!!
From 300 KB to 16 MB.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
"Hari Prasad" <hari_prasad_k@.hotmail.com> escribi en el mensaje
news:uLHvBRLiFHA.2852@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> The Size of the transaction log backup will be bigger if you have Bulk
> transaction or if you are doing a maintanence operation such
> as UPDATE STATISTICS, DBCC INDEXDEFREAG or DBCC DBREINDEX.
> Looking in to the current size the transaction log (LDF) I feel that you
are
> in safe side.
> Thanks
> Hari
> SQL Server MVP
>
>
> "Juan Carlos" <jcgalarzar@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eP2z25KiFHA.320@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
as[vbcol=seagreen]
>|||The amount of data in the log is totally dependant on what you are doing
since the last log backup. Use profiler to see what is happening during the
time when the log backups are large and you will see what i causing the
difference.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Juan Carlos" <jcgalarzar@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23pEhNpLiFHA.1372@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Hari.
> But I'm still confused about then changing size!!!
> From 300 KB to 16 MB.
> Any ideas?
> Thanks in advance.
> "Hari Prasad" <hari_prasad_k@.hotmail.com> escribi en el mensaje
> news:uLHvBRLiFHA.2852@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> are
> as
>