MySQL and SQL2000

Hi,
Not sure of the version of MySQL but do these 2 co-exist well together on
W2K3?
Thanks
Chris
As long as there is no contention for memory, hard drive, or processor, I
don't see why not.
But then, I don't see why you would want MySQL anyway.
"Chris Wood" <anonymous@.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OEb9$NE4HHA.5980@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Not sure of the version of MySQL but do these 2 co-exist well together on
> W2K3?
> Thanks
> Chris
>
|||In article <eSBJUcE4HHA.3684@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, nospam@.nospam.org
says...
> As long as there is no contention for memory, hard drive, or processor, I
> don't see why not.
> But then, I don't see why you would want MySQL anyway.
>

>
Several of our 3rd-party app's are coded to use it and have no intention
of converting to Sql2k/2k5. We are able to pretty much isolate them on
separate hardware but my guess is not everone is that lucky.
Graham (Pete) Berry
PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu

MySQL and SQL2000

Hi,
Not sure of the version of mysql but do these 2 co-exist well together on
W2K3?
Thanks
ChrisAs long as there is no contention for memory, hard drive, or processor, I
don't see why not.
But then, I don't see why you would want mysql anyway.
"Chris Wood" <anonymous@.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OEb9$NE4HHA.5980@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Not sure of the version of mysql but do these 2 co-exist well together on
> W2K3?
> Thanks
> Chris
>|||In article <eSBJUcE4HHA.3684@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, nospam@.nospam.org
says...
> As long as there is no contention for memory, hard drive, or processor, I
> don't see why not.
> But then, I don't see why you would want mysql anyway.
>

>
Several of our 3rd-party app's are coded to use it and have no intention
of converting to Sql2k/2k5. We are able to pretty much isolate them on
separate hardware but my guess is not everone is that lucky.
--
Graham (Pete) Berry
PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu

MySQL and SQL2000

Hi,
Not sure of the version of MySQL but do these 2 co-exist well together on
W2K3?
Thanks
ChrisAs long as there is no contention for memory, hard drive, or processor, I
don't see why not.
But then, I don't see why you would want MySQL anyway.
"Chris Wood" <anonymous@.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OEb9$NE4HHA.5980@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Not sure of the version of MySQL but do these 2 co-exist well together on
> W2K3?
> Thanks
> Chris
>|||In article <eSBJUcE4HHA.3684@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, nospam@.nospam.org
says...
> As long as there is no contention for memory, hard drive, or processor, I
> don't see why not.
> But then, I don't see why you would want MySQL anyway.
>
>
Several of our 3rd-party app's are coded to use it and have no intention
of converting to Sql2k/2k5. We are able to pretty much isolate them on
separate hardware but my guess is not everone is that lucky.
--
Graham (Pete) Berry
PeteBerry@.Caltech.edu